Annotated Bibliography 2026.03.15

Annotated Bibliography 2026.03.15
Yu Borui

For this week's reading, I mainly focused on Lee and Sauro's "Assessing language learning in virtual exchange".

Helm, F., & van der Velden, B. (2019). Erasmus + Virtual Exchange 2018 impact report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/668291

The European Commision's project Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange, together with the research guidelines developed by the US-based Stevens Initiative, emphasizes that virtual exchange extends beyond the development of linguistic/disciplinary skills, and focus more on the cultivation of global competences. Many of the necessary skills that can be applied in 21st century are included in the competence collection, such as cross-cultural communication, cooperation, critical thinking and so on.

O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds), Online intercultural exchange: policy, pedagogy, practice (pp. 21-66). Routledge.
Lewis and O'Dowd(2016) systematically reviewed the learning research (including foreign language learning) conducted by virtual exchange (VE) at university level, and summarized the commonly used evaluation methods in individual virtual exchange research. They emphasized that VE assessment needs to take into account the development of language ability, cross-cultural ability and comprehensive skills. Future research should explore more systematic and standardized assessment methods to adapt to different scales and diverse learning situations.

O’Dowd, R. (2010). Issues in the assessment of online interaction and exchange. Telecollaboration, 2, pp. 337-360.

Scholars pointed out that possible phenomena in practical application include but are not limited to high evaluation complexity: Virtual exchange involves not only language ability, but also multi-dimensional goals such as cross-cultural communication ability, collaboration ability and digital literacy, which makes it difficult to unify evaluation standards and methods. 
    Limited research: At that time, the empirical research on how to scientifically and systematically evaluate the results of virtual exchange learning was relatively scarce, and most of the research still focused on small-scale or case studies.
    Lack of guidance for practitioners: Teachers and researchers lack a clear theoretical framework and operational guidance when designing and implementing assessment, and need to rely on the existing research experience in the field of language assessment and cross-cultural education.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Annotated Bibliography 2026.01.15

Yu Borui         2026.01.15 Annotated Bibliography In this assignment, I mainly focus on the technological learning methods and the digital literacy of digital natives. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants . On the Horizon , 9(5) October 2001 Prensky wrote about and popularised the idea of a generation of "Digital Natives". He argued that the digital natives/the net generation/millennials are seasoned users of technology who are innately or inherently tech savvy, and that they behave and think differently because of their use of technology. Technology can shape one's way of thinking, and that directly leads to changes of one's learning styles. Warschauer, M. (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 29–46) . University of Hawai‘i Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Warschauer's findings are significant. Based on his r...
阅读全文

Annotated Bibliography 2026.02.05

Yu Borui Annotated Bibliography 2026.02.05 For this week's reading, I mainly focused on New perspectives of L2 acquisition related to human-computer interaction (HCI) written by Meunier.  According to Song et al., while voice-activated AI assistants are highly effective at processing spoken commands from native speakers, they are far less effective when the commands are given by second-language speakers. The accuracy for a second language learner is approximately 55 percent whereas the one for a native speaker rise to around 98 percent. Despite functional fluency in a second language, subtle but significant pronunciation difficulties may persist, impacting human-computer cognition. However, this also proves that speech AI can also serve as a teaching tool for learning and improving second language pronunciation. This is because that AI assistant will give a synchronal feedback when the learner provides a linguistic practice, whether it is positive or negative, t...
阅读全文

Annotated Bibliography 2026.02.14

Annotated Bibliography 2026.02.14 Yu Borui For this week's reading, I mainly focused on Chen et al.'s article, t his article introduced the application of AI technologies in second language learning.  The author emphasizes the importance of balancing AI with traditional teaching methods and using these tools responsibly in language education. Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. Lai and Gu mentioned the importance of t eachers actively encourage and guide students to use technology outside the classroom to enhance their language learning. Teachers' support is in various forms, including sharing useful technical and resource information and providing instruction. In other words, the role of the teacher is a "facilitator", not a simple knowledge lecturer. It is also worth mentioning that the scholars believe that the key goal is that teachers should conscious...
阅读全文